In re Reapportionment of the Colorado General Assembly
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentChief Justice Bender
The per curiam majority rejects the Adopted Plan on grounds that the Adopted Plan is not sufficiently attentive to county boundaries under article V, section 47(2) of the Colorado Constitution. In light of the deference we are compelled to give the Commission, I believe the Adopted Plan is sufficiently attentive to county boundaries and substantially complies with both federal and state constitutional standards. The per cu-riam majority's application of article V, seetion 47(2) goes beyond the narrow scope of review to which we are confined. By votes of 9-2 for the Senate plan and 8-8 for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re Reapportionment of the Colorado General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- In Re Reapportionment of the Colorado General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.