In Re Reapportionment of the Colorado General Assembly
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This original proceeding under article V, section 48(l)(e), of the Colorado Constitution requires us to review the Final Plan submitted by the Colorado Reapportionment Commission (Final Plan) and determine whether the plan complies with sections 46 and 47 of article V.1 A number of *189formal objections to the Final Plan have been filed with this court. Except for the division of Pitkin County into House Districts 57 and 61 and that part of the plan which unnecessarily divides Perry Park, we conclude that the Final Plan satisfies the constitutional criteria. We disapprove the Final Plan and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Sanchez v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Sanchez v. The State Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.