Legal Opinion

Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M Associates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1986No. 43 E.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This case involves a dispute between a landlord and a tenant, initiated by the landlord’s refusal to restore electricity, heat and elevator service to the tenant’s building after a *191fire in an adjacent building resulted in a shut-down of those services. The trial court, sitting as chancellor, found in favor of the tenant, appellant herein, and against the landlord, appellees herein, and awarded damages in the amount of $600,000. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed, 335 Pa.Super. 381, 484 A.2d 185, and appellant now asserts, inter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Yuhas v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Topp Copy Products, Inc. v. SingletarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. GrzeskiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kibler v. Blue Knob Recreation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API