Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M Associates
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entering judgment in favor of appellee-lessee and against appellants-lessors in the amount of $600,000.00. Because we find that certain clauses in the lease agreement exculpate appellants from liability for damages allegedly sustained by appellee, we reverse the order below.
Pursuant to the terms of a May 2, 1973 lease agreement, appellee, Princeton Sportswear Corp., became a third floor tenant of Building No. 12 of a Philadelphia industrial complex known as the “Hardwick and McGee Complex” (H & M Complex). This complex was owned by appellant H &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Richard's 5 & 10, Inc. v. Brooks Harvey Realty InvestorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Worman v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2005
- Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. H & M AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.