Ayers-Sterrett, Inc. v. American Telecommunications Systems, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rogers, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, American Telecommunications Systems, Inc. (“ATS”), appeals from a judgment of the Van Wert Municipal Court, finding that ATS fraudulently executed a change in the long-distance telephone service provider for plaintiff-appellee, Ayers-Sterrett, Inc. (“Ayers-Sterrett”). ATS contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to make the finding.
{¶ 2} After reviewing the entire record, we find that Ayers-Sterrett’s claims against ATS are manifestly service-related and that the trial court did not have jurisdiction over them. Accordingly, the judgment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delost v. First Energy Corp., 07 Ma 194 (6-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ungar v. LongworthOhio Court of Appeals · 2011