Legal Opinion

United States v. Cook

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1922No. 80PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE .COURT OF CLAIMS. Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims upholding a claim of architects for fees under a contract with the United States.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

Eames and Young, architects of St. Louis, made the plans.for a custom house at San Francisco and supervised its construction. They were to receive compensation at the rate of five per centum upon the actual cost of the work. The work was long delayed, three years, by the San Francisco earthquake and fire which increased the cost of labor and materials. Congress authorized the Secretary of the Treasury within a limit of $250,000 to make good to the contractor his loss from the' delay and enhanced prices so that he should receive enough to re coup him for his outlay but without profit. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Cherokee Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. De Rodulfa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API