Legal Opinion
Arko Executive Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 12, 2007No. Nos. 05-1193C, 06-0296CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This case, which arises under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613, stems from a contract between plaintiff, Arko Executive Services, Inc. (Arko), and the United States to provide guard services at the United States Embassy in Nicosia, Cyprus (the Embassy). Plaintiff claims that it is entitled to additional compensation owing to the extension of this contract. Defendant argues that the extension was properly made under the option to extend services clause found in one provision of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 48 C.F.R. § 52.217-8, while…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Abbott Laboratories v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Information Systems & Networks, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.