Legal Opinion
Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 26, 2010No. 10-496CPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Jurisdictionally, this bid protest rests upon the so-called third prong of 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1).1 Plaintiff, Angelica Textile Services, Inc. (“Angelica” or “Angelica Textile”), alleges that the Department of Veterans Affairs (“DVA” or “the Department”) is proceeding with a procurement of laundry services for six veterans’ hospitals in contravention of law and regulation. Angelica is the current incumbent contractor for such services, and it in essence protests the government’s restriction of the solicitation for the follow-on contract to offerors eligible…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mvs USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Bona Fide Conglomerate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- McAfee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.