Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Southern Surety Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1929No. File No. 6675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULLER, C.

Respondent’s assignor, W. V. Lowe, commencéd an action for debt against M. J. Helmer as defendant. In that action the plaintiff seized a Reo automobile under attachment, as the property of the defendant. Thereupon R. W. Helmer, appellant here, intervened and alleged ownership of the car in himself. The issue created by his claim of ownership was resolved against him, and from a decision which adjudicated the automobile to be the property of the defendant, M. J. Helmer, the intervener, R. W. Helmer, unsuccessfully appealed to this court. Lowe v. Helmer, 50 S. D. 516, 210 N. W. 737.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Whitsett v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. Palmer v. VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Benedict v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & SonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Title & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & SonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API