Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Vance

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth District. Demurrer to complaint. The bond is as follows, to wit: “ In the Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco : Chas. W. Crosby and Albert Dibblee v. A. T. Ladd and Frank D. Richardson.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Fourth District. Demurrer to complaint. The bond is as follows, to wit: “ In the Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco : Chas. W. Crosby and Albert Dibblee v. A. T. Ladd and Frank D. Richardson. Whereas, the above named plaintiffs have commenced an action in aforesaid Court against the above named defendants, for the recovery of one thousand nine hundred and seventy-six dollars and eight cents; and, whereas, an attachment was duly issued and served, as will more fully appear by the Sheriff’s return on the process in said cause. Mow, therefore, the undersigned,…

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.

Baldwin, J. concurring.

This is an action upon a bond given to release property attached.

It appears that suit was instituted by Crosby & Dibblee against Ladd & Richardson, for the sum of two thousand nine hundred and seventy-six dollars and eight cents, and an attachment issued which was levied on property of the debtors, sufficient to satisfy the debt.

In order to procure the release of the property attached, the *556defendants executed the obligation sued on, by which they undertook to pay on demand to the plaintiffs in the action the amount of the judgment and costs, not to exceed three thousand…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penter v. Staight & BeaversWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Whitsett v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. Maraman's Administrator v. MaramanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  4. Meredith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  5. Breed v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chambers v. ClineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. FargoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of HartfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API