Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & Son

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1965No. File 10098, 10099Published

1Opinion of the Court

132 N.W.2d 282 (1965)

STATE of South Dakota for the use of FARMERS STATE BANK, Plaintiff and Cross Appellant,

v.

ED COX AND SON, and William B. Cox, Defendants, and

Tennefos Construction Company and United Pacific Insurance Company, Defendants and Appellants.

Nos. 10098, 10099.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

January 6, 1965.

Stephens, Riter & Mayer, Pierre, Cupler, Tenneson, Serkland & Lundberg, Fargo, N. D., for defendants and appellants.

Carl W. Miller, Flandreau, Woods, Fuller, Shultz & Smith, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and cross appellant.

RENTTO, Judge.

The basic question posed by this litigation…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & SonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API