Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & Son
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1965No. File 10098, 10099PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*168RENTTO, J.
The basic question posed by this litigation is whether money loaned to a contractor and used by him in payment of claims that he has incurred in carrying out the provisions of his contract with the state highway authority is within the coverage of his performance bond.
The trial court held that it was and entered judgment for the use plaintiff against Ed Cox and Son, a partnership, and William B. Cox, the surviving partner, for the full amount of its loan with interest, and against Tennefos Construction Company and the United Pacific Insurance Company, the surety, in a lesser amount,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- National Live Stock Insurance v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Summit Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.