Fredrick Curtis v. Deidre Monroe, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION FREDRICK CURTIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 2:26-cv-355 ) DEIDRE MONROE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Fredrick Curtis, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [DE 1; DE 2.] Because Curtis wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, his complaint is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), which requires the dismissal of (1) “frivolous” claims, § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), see Vey v. Clinton, 520 U.S. 937, 937 (1997); (2) complaints that fail to state a claim, §…