Legal Opinion
Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 16, 2013No. 11-1917PublishedCited by 1,436 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Tara Luevano appeals the dismissal of her sex discrimination and retaliation claims against her employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Although the appeal presents a thicket of procedural issues, its ultimate resolution on the merits is straightforward. Luevano’s original, timely, pro se complaint sufficiently stated claims for sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act , of 1964. The district court erred in dismissing that original complaint but correctly did not dismiss the entire action. Accordingly, Luevano’s claims in the later…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,436 opinions
- Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Runnion Ex Rel. Rsunnion v. Girl Scouts of Greater ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Stephanie Carlson v. CSX Transportation, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
1,431 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.