Legal Opinion

Hukic v. Aurora Loan Services

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 20, 2009No. 07-3826PublishedCited by 750 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Avdo Hukic obtained a six-figure mortgage with an interest rate of 10.65%. It allowed him to pay his taxes and insurance premiums directly to the entities owed payment, but only if he promptly furnished proof to his mortgage servicer that he was making those payments. Because Hukic did not submit such proof, Aurora Loan Services, and later Ocwen Loan Servicing, also made tax and insurance payments on Hukic’s behalf. They notified Hukic of a corresponding increase in his monthly amount due, but Hukic did not change the amount he paid to them each month. The amounts…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by750 opinions

  1. Owens v. HinsleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Pooja Khungar v. Access Community Health NetworCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Stanard v. NygrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Kellie Pierce v. Zoetis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

745 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API