Legal Opinion

E.P. Paup Co. v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1993No. Nos. 91-70325, 91-70350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a final decision of the Benefits Review Board (“Board”) awarding disability benefits to an injured 'employee, Arthur McDougall (“McDougall”), and directing that his employer, E.P. Paup Company (“employer”), reimburse the State of Washington (“state”) for benefits previously paid under state workers’ compensation law. The employer and its federal workers’ compensation carrier, Insurance Company of North America (“INA”), contend on appeal that 33 U.S.C. § 903 of the Longshore and Harbor' Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. v. EggertWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lillbask Ex Rel. Mauclaire v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  5. STEVEDORING SERV. OF AMERICA v. EggertWashington Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API