Legal Opinion
Lillbask Ex Rel. Mauclaire v. Sergi
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2000No. Civ. 3:97cv1202(PCD)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
State Defendants move for summary judgment. State Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment against State Defendants. Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Redding Defendants move for partial summary judgment. Redding Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment against Redding Defendants. Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. JURISDICTION
This court has subject matter…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Lillbask v. State of Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Lillbask Ex Rel. Mauclaire v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Stuart & Sons, L.P. v. Curtis Publishing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Fetto v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.