Legal Opinion

Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1962No. 532PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

Section 3 (a) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act provides that compensation shall be paid only for injuries occurring on navigable waters “and if recovery . . . through workmen’s compensation proceedings may not validly be provided by State law.” 1 In each of these cases the petitioner is a Deputy Commissioner who based an award of compensation under the Act on findings that the employee was engaged at the time of his injury in the work of completing the construction of a vessel afloat on navigable waters.2 *116Before the Longshoremen’s Act was passed, this Court had…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API