Legal Opinion
Spring v. Spring
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 11, 1930No. 39904PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
I. The plaintiff’s action is predicated on that form of resulting trust involved and defined in Cotton v. Wood, 25 Iowa 43, and which was briefly stated therein as follows:
“Where, upon the purchase of property, the consideration is paid by one, and the legal title conveyed to another, a resulting trust is thereby raised, and the person named in the deed will hold the property as trustee of the party paying the consideration. ’ ’
The foregoing pronouncement has been followed and elaborated in a long line of our casos, a few of which are. the following : Freeborn v. Servis, 182 Iowa 1350; In re…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cotton v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Dunn v. Zwilling Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Culp v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Romp v. MahinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Freeborn v. ServisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lutz v. DarbyshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Sinclair v. AllenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Gregory Ex Rel. Gregory v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Matter of Scheib TrustCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.