Bodley v. Jones
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, Judge,
delivering the opinion of the court:
This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery impressing a trust in favor of the appellee upon the proceeds of a certain bond and mortgage.
The appellee seeks to enforce an alleged resulting trust. She claims to be the real owner of $3500 invested in a bond and mortgage by William Fortner during his lifetime.
The appellant is Fortner’s executor.
The complainant in her bill alleges, among other things, that William Fortner at the time of his death was the legal owner of a bond and mortgage in the amount of $3500, executed by Royden Caulk…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Govin v. . De MirandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Bell & Howell Co. v. BlissCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Hollida v. ShoopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Skoglund v. Ormand Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
- Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.