Legal Opinion
Jackson-Pringle v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-1880Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDY JACKSON-PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1880 (JDB) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Judy Jackson-Pringle brings this claim against her employer, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), alleging various forms of discrimination and unlawful employer activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. See Compl. [ECF No. 1] ¶¶ 43–65. The core of her claim is an allegation of unlawful retaliation in response to a 2017…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.