Legal Opinion

Kaminski v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1985No. 00067 Philadelphia 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant-insurer contends that the lower court erred in permitting two expert witnesses to testify on behalf of appellees-insureds with respect to the cause and origin of the fire in question when those experts were not identified in appellees’ answers to interrogatories and were not identified as appellees’ expert witnesses until the sixth day of trial. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.

*402Following a May 5, 1980 fire which damages and/or destroyed their house and its contents, appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Kaminski, submitted a claim in the amount of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Nissley v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Emerick v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Catina v. MareeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Sindler v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Dion v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API