Legal Opinion

Sindler v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1982No. 655PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal from the grant of a new trial arises from an action in trespass. The original complaint consisted of two counts, the first a malpractice action by appellee, Marylin Sindler against appellant, Dr. Gilbert S. Goldman, and the second, an action for loss of consortium by appellee Norman Sindler against Dr. Goldman.

The case was tried before a jury, the Honorable Ralph H. Smith, Jr., presiding. The jury returned a verdict for Dr. Goldman on both counts on April 5, 1976. The Sindlers filed a Motion for New Trial which was granted by the lower court en banc (R.H. Smith, Jr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Nissley v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Gilligan v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Butler v. KIWI, SASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Cooper v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API