Emerick v. Carson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellants, William Emerick and Marie Emerick, instituted this action in trespass seeking to recover damages for injuries sustained by William Emerick when he was struck by an automobile driven by the Defendant-Appellee, Roger Martin Carson. The jury which considered the evidence attributed 70% of the causal negligence to Appellant William Emerick and 30% of the causal negligence to Appellee. Because the jury found Appellant’s negligence to be greater than Appellee’s, a recovery was denied and the jury did not address the issue of damages. Appellants filed this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Mt. Lebanon v. County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SevilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Cusatis v. ReichertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gerace v. Holmes Protection of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.