Legal Opinion
Kusens v. Johannesburg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1966No. 65-178PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The order appealed was entered subsequent to a final decree, but inasmuch as it was entered for the purpose of adjudicating rights which purportedly arose after the final decree, it is here treated as a full appeal. On November 2, 1964, the chancellor entered a final decree in which he attempted to settle claims and counter-claims which had been the subject of two separate suits before him. This decree was not appealed, and each party is now bound by its provisions. As a part of this final decree the chancellor provided as follows:
“8. All assets and liabilities of Bonded Motors, Inc. now or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Young v. StoutamireSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Abramson v. BrantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Efraim Rosen, Inc. v. Tavormina (In Re Armando Gerstel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1984
- Leatherman v. GimourginasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Investment Research Institute, Inc. v. Sherbank Marketing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kusens v. JohannesburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968