Kusens v. Johannesburg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
By these consolidated appeals, the appellants seek review of two orders entered subsequent to the mandate going down in Kusens v. Johannesburg, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 468. One of these orders discharged the escrow agent referred to in the cited case. The other dismissed an amended complaint for partition.
The orders under review arrived in this court with a presumption of correctness. Dade County v. Pepper, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 198; Althouse v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 859; Coleman v. Coleman, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 460. It was incumbent upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- McFadden v. SwinertonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Dade County v. PepperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- City of South Bay v. ArmstrongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.