Legal Opinion

Investment Research Institute, Inc. v. Sherbank Marketing, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1998No. C-970207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

This appeal arises from a post-judgment garnishment proceeding. Garnishments in the amount of $78,109.04 were issued to the defendants-appellants, International Business Systems Information, Inc. (“IBI”) and Walter A. Lynch, its president, directing the two to pay any accounts payable IBI had with Sherbank Marketing Services, Inc. (“Sherbank”) to the plaintiff-appellee, Investment Research Institute, Inc. (“IRI”). The trial court found that IBI and Lynch deliberately circumvented the • garnishments by paying $50,000 to Sherbank’s receiver through IBI’s lawyer. Consequently,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Wilmington and Zanesville Railroad v. IliffOhio Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Saad v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Coburn v. AnsartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  4. K-M Auto Supply, Inc. v. RenoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. Kusens v. JohannesburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RubioColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Hadassah v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Prokos v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API