Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Freitas

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 2, 2005No. AC 25438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The plaintiff, Michele Bishop, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting her motion to modify child support to be paid by the defendant, Michael Freitas. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined the defendant’s income for the purposes of calculating child support payments by omitting certain income and deductions relating to the sub-chapter S corporation of which the defendant is the president and sole shareholder. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court failed to assess as income (1) the defendant’s subchapter S depreciation adjustment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Unkelbach v. McNarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Evans v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Signore v. SignoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Bishop v. FreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API