Legal Opinion
Loral Defense Systems-Akron v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1999No. Nos. 97-5223, 97-5224PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, District Judge.
Petitioners Loral Defense Systems-Akron (“Loral”) and Aircraft Braking Systems Corp. (“Aircraft”) petition for review of the Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) finding that they violated Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5), by unilaterally changing health care plans covering employees represented by the UAW. The NLRB cross-petitions for enforcement of its Order.1 For the reasons stated below, we deny Loral’s and Aircraft Braking Sys*440terns’ Petition and grant the Board’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Abrams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Aimee M. Thorman v. James E. Grimes Jr., Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Amanda Yvonne Cooper v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Austin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Baumiller v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.