Legal Opinion

Versyss Incorporated v. Coopers and Lybrand, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 30, 1992No. 92-1212PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

This case presents a common problem in statutory interpretation. Congress drafted a law that clearly embraces some transactions, clearly excludes others, and is now brought to bear on a transaction that Congress probably did not consider. We are left to make a judgment based on clues garnered from statutory language, legislative history, purpose and policy. In our view, the transaction at issue does not fit comfortably within the statutory language, and no clear policy or precedent encourages courts to extend that language beyond its normal bounds.

I

On May 17, 1985,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marine Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. DeMaria v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API