Legal Opinion
Hartford Empire Co. v. Obear Nester Glass Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 24, 1931No. 8524PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a corporation of the state of Delaware, is engaged in the business of manufacturing glass-working machinery which it customarily installs on a royalty basis in plants engaged in the business of manufacturing glassware. The corporate defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, is engaged in the business of manufacturing glass products of various kinds. The individual defendant, a citizen of Missouri, is employed by the other defendant.
This is an action for the alleged infringement of the following patents owned by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Busch v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Gelinas v. BuffumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933