Legal Opinion
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Baridon
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1934No. 9955PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Tho Du Pont Company in the year 1928 was Manufacturing and marketing' a patented product known as “'Semesan,” a poisonous compound with a mercury base, and so labeled, which it advertised as a seed disinfectant or fungicide. The company recommended its use for the treatment of seeds, roots, and bulbs before planting, and represented it as a safe and beneficial plant disinfectant, and, by labels on the containers and by pamphlets furnished to customers through dealers, directed how it should be used. P. C. Baridon was a grower of, and dealer in, gladiolus bulbs,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Florence Wright and Roy Wright v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.