Haehlen v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This appeal grew out of a dispute over a boundary line fence separating the property of plaintiffs and defendants.
Plaintiffs owned a lot 150 feet square situated in the northeast corner of a block in the city of Alturas. Defendants owned a lot immediately to the south of the lot of plaintiffs, and also owned a strip or corridor seven feet wide and one hundred and fifty feet long, running north and south and adjoining the lot of plaintiffs on the west.
Both plaintiffs and defendants operated auto camps and had erected cabins on their respective properties, which they rented to the traveling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rideout v. KnoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Varney & Green v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McCloskey v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Western Granite & Marble Co. v. KnickerbockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gallagher v. DodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hutcherson v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Oliver v. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Griffin v. NorthridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mathewson v. PrimeauWashington Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.