Western Granite & Marble Co. v. Knickerbocker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of® the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
The defendants appeal from the judgment, and from a refusal of a new trial.
The appellants and respondent own adjoining lots in the city of San Jose. The complaint contains two *113counts. The first describes plaintiff’s lot, and avers that it has erected a building thereon for its offices, which building has six windows in the northerly wall, through which, only, light and air are or can be admitted into that portion of the building; and if such light and air be materially obstructed, said portion of plaintiff’s building will become useless. Plaintiff has been using the building and…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Griffin v. NorthridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wilson v. HandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Horan v. ByrnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.