Legal Opinion

State v. Meade

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2008No. C051030CR, C051433CR, A130132 (Control) A1301333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who was convicted in these consolidated cases following a bench trial of two counts of second-degree burglary, ORS 164.215, two counts of first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, and 15 counts of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, appeals, challenging the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences on several of those convictions. Specifically, defendant contends that the imposition of consecutive sentences based on judicial factfinding violated the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by the court in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API