Legal Opinion
State v. Bighouse
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 22, 2008No. C033240CR, C040163CR, C041507CR A126980 (Control) A126981 A126982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*263ARMSTRONG, J.
Defendant petitions for reconsideration in this case in which we affirmed his convictions without opinion, State v. Bighouse, 217 Or App 428, 175 P3d 1028 (2008). For the reasons below, we allow reconsideration, withdraw our former opinion, and remand for resentencing.
Defendant appeals after being convicted of encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.686; identity theft, ORS 165.800 (2003);1 attempted theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045; criminal possession of a forgery device, ORS 165.032; and attempted manufacture of a controlled substance, former ORS…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BIGHOUSECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008