Legal Opinion

State v. Bighouse

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2008No. C033240CR, C040163CR, C041507CR A126980 (Control) A126981 A126982Published

1Opinion of the Court

196 P.3d 538 (2008)

223 Or. App. 261

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Richard Carl BIGHOUSE, aka Richard Earl Bighouse, Defendant-Appellant.

C033240CR, C040163CR, C041507CR; A126980 (Control); A126981; A126982.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

On Appellant's Petition for Reconsideration March 11, 2008.

Resubmitted En Banc July 1, 2008.

Decided October 22, 2008.

Affirmed Without Opinion January 9, 2008.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, and Tammy W. Sun, Deputy Public Defender, Legal Services Division, for petition.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API