Legal Opinion
Christopher Dyer v. Hinky Dinky, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1983No. 82-1805PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is the proper method of calculating backpay under § 2022 of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et seq. (“Veterans’ Act” or “Act”). The employer, Hinky Dinky, Inc., concedes that it gave its employee, Christopher Dyer, an improper seniority date which resulted in lost wages and vacation pay for the period immediately following Dyer’s discharge from military service. Hinky Dinky later promoted Dyer to service manager. The district court compared his higher earnings as service manager with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Samuel C. Hanna, Cross-Appellee v. American Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- William T. Gilbert, III v. Monsanto Company, - William T. Gilbert, III v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Brian S. Leib v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Hartman v. DuffeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Cherry v. AugustusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.