Visnick v. Caulfield
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.
This case presents the question whether the absolute litigation privilege applies to statements made by the defendant, Jeannette C. Caulfield, in the course of her sexual harassment complaint to the employer of plaintiff Gary Visnick and to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). We conclude the privilege is applicable.
Factual background. Visnick and Caulfield were employed by Marriott International, Inc., doing business as Cambridge *810Center Marriott (Marriott), in Cambridge. Visnick, an assistant restaurant manager, was the direct supervisor of Caulfield, a bartender, from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bartle v. BerryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Edwards v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Kocontes v. McQuaidNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Akar v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. v. PorroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.