Legal Opinion
Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 5, 1996No. 96-1104PublishedCited by 236 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRES, District Judge.
Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Ollie Lattimore with respect to several claims of racial harassment and employment discrimination brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and Mass. Gen. L. ch. 151B, § 4 (“Chapter 151B”). Polaroid contends that the District Court erred in denying Polaroid’s motions for summary judgment, for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. Because we conclude that the motion for judgment as a matter of law should have been granted with respect to some of Lattimore’s claims…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Patricia D. Rush v. McDonald Corporation, Sharon Funston, and William R. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by236 opinions
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Fantini v. Salem State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Feliciano De La Cruz v. El Conquistador Resort & Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- White v. New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.