Legal Opinion

Correllas v. Viveiros

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1991PublishedCited by 244 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This case arises from allegedly false statements made about Patricia M. Correllas (plaintiff) by Michelle Viveiros to police officers during the course of a criminal investigation. The plaintiff brought this action, alleging malicious prosecution, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The judge granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant because (1) the defendant did not, as a matter of law, institute criminal proceedings against the plaintiff as required for malicious prosecution; (2) the statements were absolutely privileged, and thus could support neither a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Stone v. Essex County Newspapers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by244 opinions

  1. Nieves v. McSweeneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Limone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Burke v. Town of WalpoleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Draghetti v. ChmielewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API