Legal Opinion

ROTIMI

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2008No. ID 3616PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 567

(BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3616 Matter of Felix ROTIMI, Respondent File A73 561 893 - New York Decided July 30, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An alien has not “lawfully resided” in the United States for purposes of qualifying for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (2006), during any periods in which the alien was an applicant for asylum or for adjustment of status and lacked any other basis on which to claim lawful residence.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Martinez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. LOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
  5. Tim Lok v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Quinchia v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. KOLJENOVICBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
  3. REZABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
  4. Rotimi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Adrian Vargas Cervantes v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API