Legal Opinion

McRostie v. City of Owatonna

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1922No. 22,697PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

There was a judgment rendered on the pleadings for defendant a.nd plaintiff appeals.

The facts are these: Plaintiff was the owner of a small strip of land in the city of Owatonna upon which was a barn of the alleged value of $2,500. Defendant by a proceeding in eminent domain, as authorized by its charter undertook to acquire this strip and some other property, owned by different parties, for a public street. The award of damages by commissioners duly appointed was confirmed by the city council. Plaintiff and the other parties interested appealed to the district court. Plaintiff’s appeal is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Schmoll v. LuchtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Bergman v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Ford v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of WangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Anderson v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API