Ford Motor Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After tbe second appeal reported in 136 Minn. 475, 162 N. W. 1087, tbe motion of tbe Ford Motor Company in tbe district court for Hennepin county for tbe allowance of interest on the award from tbe date of the first award until tbe making of tbe motion, and for judgment for the amount of tbe award, with interest so computed, was denied by Steele, J. From the order denying tbe motion, Ford Motor Company appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The city of Minneapolis instituted proceedings to condemn the right of way for an alley through a block of land owned and occupied by the Ford Motor Company. The commissioners, appointed by the city to assess benefits and damages, filed their award on July 30, 1915. The motor company appealed-to the district court from the award of damages and also from the order establishing the alley. The district court affirmed the order establishing the alley and appointed commissioners to reassess the damages. The motor company attacked the validity of the proceedings by writ of certiorari and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warren v. First Division of St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Commissioners of State Park v. HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- City of Minneapolis v. WilkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Whitacre v. Saint Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. ConeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- McRostie v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. CarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.