Legal Opinion

Abron v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 11, 1977No. Civ. Y-75-539PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

This action, filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, concerns claims of racial discrimination against the Black and Decker Manufacturing Company at its Hampstead, Maryland plant. The plaintiff, Sarah Abron, brought this action on behalf of herself and a class which was certified by this Court, pursuant to Rule 23 F.R.Civ.P., to include all black persons who either have been employed, are currently employed or will be, or will seek to be, employed by the defendant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDIA CORPORATION, a Corp., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Muriel E. Kauffman v. Sidereal Corporation, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Pedreyra v. Cornell Prescription Pharmacies, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API