Legal Opinion

Muriel E. Kauffman v. Sidereal Corporation, an Oregon Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1983No. 80-3232PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee Kauffman brought this action against her former employer, Sidereal Corporation (Sidereal), a small computerized communications manufacturer. The only claim remaining at trial alleged unlawful retaliation by the employer in response to Kauffman’s filing of a sex discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The matter was tried to the court and a judgment was rendered for Kauffman. In awarding damages, the trial court held that unemployment benefits should not be deducted from the backpay award. Kauffman received a judgment of $9,667.70 for backpay…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hacienda HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API