Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Heckman v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1902No. 4222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

— The relator, Heckman, applied for an alternative writ of prohibition to the superior court of King county. He stated that a suit was pending in the superior court, wherein William Curtis was plaintiff and relator and Hanson were defendants, and Larsen was receiver; that relator was interested beneficially therein; that on the 17th day of January, 1902, relator and Hanson as co-partners, were adjudged bankrupts in the United States district court; that said suit in the superior court was founded upon a claim against said co-partners from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Strohl v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Freeman v. FortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Springer v. AyerWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Jensen-King-Byrd Co. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. MacKall-paine Veneer Co. v. Vancouver Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Yeatman v. PatricianWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In re Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API