Legal Opinion

Yeatman v. Patrician

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1927No. 20533. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, C. J.

The appellant, as trustee in bankruptcy of tbe separate estate of Grace Patrician, began this action in replevin to secure possession of a store and stock of hardware at Woodland, in Cowlitz county. ...

Tbe respondent Oliver bad been, for a. couple of years, in partnership with W. D. Patrician in tbe conduct of tbis hardware business, and in December, 1922, sold bis interest in tbe partnership to Patrician and, in payment for it, received a note and chattel mortgage on tbe stock and fixtures of tbe store, which mortgage was properly filed. Tbis note and mortgage were renewed by a new note and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. ScarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In re SanderlinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Heckman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Strandberg v. StringerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Inland Finance Co. v. J. B. Ingersoll Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nett v. Stockgrowers' Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. MacKall-paine Veneer Co. v. Vancouver Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bekins v. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API