Hammond Lumber Co. v. Fanta
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Grant Jackson, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ,
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Hammond Lumber Company, one of the plaintiffs in a consolidated action by lien claimants, being dissatisfied with the amount of the judgment entered in its favor, appeals therefrom and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
There is but one question in this appeal, depending for solution upon the construction to be given- to a certain assignment. B. Fanta was the owner of real property upon which a building was being erected. J. M. Thomas was his contractor, and appellant was furnishing lumber not only for the house on Fanta’s property but for other buildings in course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miles v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Newport Wharf & Lumber Co. v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ray v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bay Lumber Co. v. EatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931