Legal Opinion
Bay Lumber Co. v. Eaton
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1931No. Docket No. 4465PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, from which judgment the above-named defendants appeal.
The record shows that Arthur P. Creel, Tommie Creel, his wife; L. Q. Brenson and Cora Brenson, his wife, entered into an agreement with a contractor by the name of Albert M. Eaton for the construction of a building upon certain real estate belonging to the appellants; that thereafter, Albert M. Baton, as such contractor, purchased of and from the plaintiff, lumber and materials for use in the construction of said building, to the value of $1563.04, upon which there was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. FantaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lumber Supply Inc. v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- MUTUAL LUMBER COMPANY v. GeroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Ewing Irrigation Products v. Rohnert Park Golf Course Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1973